| SubterFUDGE | ![]() |
| Subter | |
| SubterFUDGE |
ABOUT FUDGE
Fudge is a role-playing game written by Steffan O'Sullivan, with extensive input from the Usenet community of rec.games.design. The basic rules of Fudge are available on the internet at http://www.fudgerpg.com and in book form from Grey Ghost Games, P.O. Box 838, Randolph, MA 02368. They may be used with any gaming genre. While an individual work derived from Fudge may specify certain attributes and skills, many more are possible with Fudge. Every Game Master using Fudge is encouraged to add or ignore any character traits. Anyone who wishes to distribute such material for free may do so - merely include this ABOUT FUDGE notice and disclaimer (complete with Fudge copyright notice). If you wish to charge a fee for such material, other than as an article in a magazine or other periodical, you must first obtain a royalty-free license from the author of Fudge, Steffan O'Sullivan, P.O. Box 465, Plymouth, NH 03264.
DISCLAIMER
The following materials based on Fudge, entitled Fudge: Falkenstein, are created by, made available by, and Copyright (C) 2001-2002 by Jorge Arredondo, and are not necessarily endorsed in any way by Steffan O'Sullivan or any publisher of other Fudge materials. Neither Steffan O'Sullivan nor any publisher of other Fudge materials is in any way responsible for the content of these materials unless specifically credited. Original Fudge materials Copyright (C)1992-1995 by Steffan O'Sullivan, All Rights Reserved.
This article is about the conversion of the rule system of Castle Falkenstein to FUDGE: what I denominate Falkenstein by FUDGE.
Falkenstein measures attributes and skills equally, using the same scale, like FUDGE. The conversion of the values of Falkenstein to FUDGE will use the following table:
| Falkenstein scale | FUDGE scale | ||||||||||
And why the scale in FUDGE translates Average to Mediocre instead of to Fair? Simple enough. Because an starting character in Falkenstein can have skills at Extraordinary level. If the base scale in FUDGE started in Fair the corresponding level would be Legendary...
In fact, if you want the Extraordinary label translated as Legendary, it would be a good idea to forbid the characters having from the beginning skills that high.
Lets see now the list of attributes and skills. In the case of skills, great part of them are the same than in Falkenstein. Others are modifications of standard skills and others are new additions. We'll mark the attributes in boldface to differentiate them of the skills, although this diferenciación is only semantic, it doesn't have any effect in the game.
We'll also underline the new skills and those that have been split in several, to differentiate them clearly of the standard skills of the game.
Let see now the initial levels that a character has in the new system. I may come up with a few optional rules, and if I find them useful, I'll add them as an extra couple of approaches to this topic.
There is a problem regarding this conversion: there are 3 skills they have been divided in 3 each one (adding 6 skills thus to the total). The problem with these new 6 skills is that in the original system when we allocated a value to the original ability, it affected the whole range of current subtypes (for example, in Marksmanship). Right now we lose "points" with this system. For that, my proposal is to distribute 4 free skill levels that may be used to increase any skill or attribute, with a maximum score of Good.
For example: a character generated with this system adds a level to his Exchequer skill that was at his base level of Mediocre, making it Fair; then he adds a level more to Fencing (1 handed weapons) which improves it from Fair to Good (the maximum allowed) and finally he improves his Mediocre Physique to Good spending the two levels that he had left.
In the original game of Falkenstein there isn't such a thing as Gifts and Faults. But then again, this is Falkenstein by FUDGE. Gifts and faults give a lot of depth to the game and also lots of variability to the same, and they make the characters much more believable and dramatic.
My proposal about this is the following:
Everything with the approval of the Gamemaster, of course.
And about possible lists of Gifts and Faults, my advice is to take a look to Five Point FUDGE which is quite a good idea anyway :)
The most important factors of the original system of Falkenstein, which we'll try to conserve, are the following:
Having these ideas in mind we'll try to make a simpler enough conversion.
We maintain the cost and the modifiers of the spells the same as in Falkenstein, and we subtract the sorcerer's ability in FUDGE adding 4 to it and multiplying the result by 2 (which gives us a result between 2 and 14).
Each concentration round we also roll 3DF, we add 4 to the result and then we multiply it by 2. This gives us a result between 2 and 14, the same as the range in Falkenstein, but it is not linear (the most probable result is 8) neither we can obtain odd values (3, 5, 7,..., 13). This value represents the quantity of magical energy that the sorcerer is able to gather for each 2 minutes round.
If the roll of magical energy was a -3, we will roll an additional 1DF to see if the spell turns Wild. If we roll a +1, the spell is normal. If we roll 0 or -1, the spell turns Wild and it takes place right in that moment. This way to check the occurrence of Wild magic is not the same as that of Falkenstein, which has a smaller probability of happening (at least while there are still around 30 cards) and it also varies according to the number of cards there are left.
It will be also necessary to roll to see the magic Realm that grants us that magical energy. To continue using the FUDGE system we can limit ourselves to roll 4DF (grouped more or less in intervals with 25% each one):
| Roll | Realm |
| 0 | Emotional or Mental magic |
| -1 or -3 | Material magic |
| +1 or +3 | Spiritual and Dimensional magic |
| 2, -2, 4 or -4 | Elemental magic |
If we roll the same Realm than the Realm associated to the spell, perfect. We accumulate the complete rolled value; if not, we can opt to add 1 and introduce non-aligned magic (in this case it is convenient to write down the rolled maximum actual value of the non-aligned magical energy we use, to use it later to measure the collateral effects it causes), or ignore it and wait.
Note: since in a pack of cards there is a maximum of 54 cards (52 normal cards and two jokers), the maximum value we can obtain using only aligned power is 91 points of magical energy, and using non-aligned power a maximum of 130. Anyway, we'll only be able to roll during 52 consecutive rounds to accumulate energy (whenever the spell being cast requires those costs of power). Moreover so, when rolling dice we can be lucky and obtain enormous quantities of magical energy in a moment, since the results can repeat. It is necessary to keep in mind the maximum that I have mentioned as an absolute maximum.
Another form of accumulating magical energy is carried out at the price of weakening ourselves or a victim (in Falkenstein, 2 points of magical energy obtained this way cause a wound). I propose to count that wound cost in FUDGE the same way, as a life level (starting from the lowest free life level, getting higher levels while the mage hurts himself spending his life levels as magical energy).
Now we're going to add the conversion of Castle Falkenstein typical weapons to FUDGE. In some cases, I've extrapolated the damage that the different weapons do, in other I've just used the classic examples of FUDGE about generic weapons.
We'll also cover some specific data about dragons and their characteristics, about iron and iron alloys against faeries, and finally some details about constitutional shock "attacks".
| Melee weapon | Damage modifier |
| Hatpin | +0 piercing |
| Life preserver | +0 bludgeoning |
| Cudgel or club | +1 bludgeoning |
| Dagger or bayonet | +1 piercing |
| Rapier or Court Sword | +2 piercing |
| Spear (medium) | +2 piercing |
| Spear (large) | +3 piercing |
| Saber or sword | +3 piercing/slashing |
| Range weapon | Damage modifier |
| Derringer | +1 piercing |
| Throwing dagger | +1 piercing |
| Bow | +2 piercing |
| Carbine | +2 piercing |
| Drop pistol | +2 piercing |
| Javelin | +2 piercing |
| Pepperbox revolver | +2 piercing |
| Shotgun | +3 piercing |
| Elfshot | +3 piercing |
| Musket | +3 piercing |
| Reciprocator | +3 piercing |
| Needle rifle | +3 piercing |
| Chassepot rifle | +3 piercing |
| Gatling gun | +5 piercing |
| Shrapnel | +5 piercing |
| French mitrailleuse | +5 piercing |
| Swooning (unusual kinds of injury) | Damage modifier (constitutional shock) |
| Great heat, cold, or too-tight corset | +1 |
| Threatening gaze | +1 |
| Extremely foul language | +2 |
| Rough treatment | +2 |
Iron, steel or cold iron weapons do a considerable amount of extra damage to faeries. In the case of iron or steel a weapon has an extra damage bonus of +1. Cold iron has an extra bonus of +3. It's obvious that a good hit with any weapon with a respectable damage bonus can be fatal to almost any faerie...
Dragon characters, depending on their physique, have a natural armor (only on their dragon forms) that is able to soak some damage. Besides, the damage a dragon inflicts with its natural weapons (claws and fire breath) depends also on their physique (of course, also on their dragon form). We'll use the following table for all that information:
| Dragon physique | Claws and teeth damage (melee) | Fire breath damage | Natural armor |
| Poor | +2 slashing | +3 fire | - |
| Mediocre | +2 slashing | +3 fire | - |
| Fair | +3 slashing | +4 fire | +1 |
| Good | +3 slashing | +4 fire | +1 |
| Great | +4 slashing | +5 fire | +2 |
| Superb | +5 slashing | +6 fire | +3 |
Also, the superb health of dragons grants them an extra "Scratch" life level and a "Hurt" life level as well, in all their forms.
Note: using its fire breath causes wounds (1 life levels) to a dragon in the same way a wizard hurts himself using its own life force to empower spells. For example, the first use of its fire breath to an unhurt dragon would cause it one level of "Scratch". The second use would cause it another "Scratch", and so on.
Hits since 09/June/2003:
|